February 22, 2008
Electronic Medical Records: Google and Cleveland Clinic Pair Up
I remember when my wife Kim and I were first searching for a diagnosis for our daughter. We went from doctor to doctor – Geneticists, Neurologists, Pediatricians, GI’s, etc. Living in the Boston area we had broad access to a number of doctors who specialized in specific areas – which at first glance seemed great. And, at some level it is. However, the fragmentation of the healthcare system in Boston also created a big issue around sharing information between specialists, and accessing medical records. I can’t even tell you how many times we had doctors cutting and pasting information out of their hospital systems into emails so we could share prior tests with professionals at other hospitals. You would think that doctors have better things to do with their time.
We oscillated across three separate hospitals in search of a diagnosis -- Mass General, Boston Childrens, and Tufts New England Medical Center. We found ourselves answering the same questions over and over again. Finally, Kim put the family tree/ genetic map into a PowerPoint slide and started pulling it out-- the medical professionals looked at her like she was the next coming of Bill Gates. It saved us about 10 - 15 minutes at the start of every meeting.
Today, we still use doctors at all three hospitals for our daughter. The medical records are still spread across all of them. We still spend time transferring information from one hospital to the other. In fact, I find a bit of irony that with all the money spent on electronic medical records (EMRs) -- which figures into our healthcare costs -- the most comprehensive medical record we have on our daughter happens to be a three ring binder that sits in our home. Every doctors’ letter is in it, every blood test, and much more – including Kim’s original PowerPoint slide.
For caregivers and patients, not having quick access to their records can be disastrous. For doctors and medical staff, it can be frustrating, time-consuming, and lead to major mistakes in care options.
So the focus these days is on management of electronic medical records, who owns them, where they reside, how to make them portable, how to protect privacy along the way. Both Google and Microsoft have pilot programs to house personal medical records in large databases so that any doctor anywhere can access information about any patient. Of course, there is controversy.
But for us, the larger issue is that there is movement away from the concept that individual hospitals own your information, and toward a more open architecture that favors the patient and not the hospital.
While the important debate about privacy and security goes on, Kim and I are thrilled to see that one hospital, the prestigious Cleveland Clinic, is engaging in a pilot program with Google to store medical records in a central database built by Google. We applaud the Cleveland Clinic’s efforts toward portability and accessibility, and look forward to the results of the pilot.
Brian Costello
carespace.com
For more on this:
techdirt.com
cnn.com
wsj health blog